Although Article 17/1 of the Civil Code of the UAE provides that it is the law of the Deceased that shall govern the inheritance at the time of his death, Article 17 (5) of the same law provided that UAE law shall apply to wills made by aliens disposing of their real property located in the State. Moreover, Article 1/2 of the UAE Personal Status Law states that "the provisions of the law shall apply to non-UAE nationalities without the foreigner elects to apply his or her personal status law".
It could be understood then that when a foreigner dies in the UAE leaving assets in the country, his or her home country law could be applied based on Article 17/1 and that his or her heirs can request the court for the application of their own country law as well. However, Article 17/5 puts a limitation to the freedom of disposition of assets by a foreigner with regard to his or her real properties located in the country.
Inheritance rules in the UAE always has an element of judicial discretion. Judges are not bound by precedents or decisions made by other courts and higher courts in a similar case. Judges make their decisions in accordance with the dictates of their conscience and the principles of Shariah. There are a number of cases decided by the courts applying Shariah and UAE law to wills made by foreigners disposing of their assets here. But there are also cases decided by the courts granting the application of the foreigner's home country law.
One such case is Cassation Case No. 3/1998. This is a case of a Hindu man who died leaving a will naming his son as the only heir. Upon his death, the Deceased's mother obtained an order from the Court of First Instance and later the Court of Appeals for the division of the asserted assets. The court ordered that one-sixth of the asset will go to the mother, one-eighth to the wife and the reminder of the asset to the son. The wife of the deceased filed an application to the High Court to nullify the order of division of the asset and to give the entire estate to the son who was named as the sole heir in the will in accordance with the law of India.
The court of cassation overruled the orders of the lower courts. It pointed out that the case was for the enforcement of the will and not for the amendment of division of assets as what the lower courts propounded. The court clarified that the will not be affected by the Personal Status rule that the testator may not pass on property to any of his or her heirs without the consent of the other heirs. Since the Deceased and his family are not UAE nationalities and they are not Muslims, then the law that they have chosen to apply should be applied. While this decision allowed non-Muslim residents to apply their home country law with regard to their wills, such laws will not be applied if they offend public policy. In this case, it does not offend public policy.
If courts in many cases applied Sharia law in matters of will of a non-Muslim, non-UAE national – why still make a will?
Regardless of this fact, it is always advisable to have a will rather than no will at all to document testator's intentions. It gives comfort that something has been done to protect one's family in case of any eventuality, even though it does not give the guarantee which one expect.
In a judgment rendered by the Court of Cassation in case No. 90/2006, if the heirs was between non-Muslims regardless of their religion (Christian, Jew or Hindu), denied law can be applied in case of death even if the distribution of the prohibited law differs from Sharia law. Sharia rules and principles are not breached as far as none of the parties are UAE national or a foreign Muslim.
It is important to note here that the dispute contradicts the official interpretation of Law No. 2. 28 of 2005 which considered that applying foreign law shall not contradict Shariah principles.